South Africa Postpones Tough New Travel Rules To June 2015

South Africa Postpones Tough New Travel Rules To June 2015

From The Independent

South Africa has delayed the implementation of tough new immigration rules for young travelers. The requirement for families to take birth certificates for under-18s, with additional supporting evidence if both parents are not travelling, has been postponed from 1 October to 1 June next year. Airlines serving South Africa had called the regulations “a tourism, PR, economic and political disaster”.

Families travelling to the country next summer will still face a tangle of red tape. The new law seeks to tackle child abduction and the trafficking of young people.

Any child arriving in South Africa must have a full birth certificate. And if both parents are not together with the child, the one who is travelling needs a legally endorsed affidavit from the other parent “authorizing him or her to enter into or depart from the Republic of South Africa with the child he or she is traveling with.”

In the case of a family break-up or if one parent has passed away, the travelling parent will need to produce a court order granting full parental responsibilities or the death certificate.

When a child – perhaps a friend of the family – is travelling with adults who are not his or her parents, they must present a legal affidavit, plus copies of the biological parents’ passports and their contact details.

Airlines serving South Africa say South Africa will be the only country in the world requiring under-18s to produce a birth certificate at the time of travel. Since airlines are routinely fined for landing people who are found to be inadmissible, they are likely to err on the side of caution at check-in.

Any parent who cannot produce an unabridged birth certificate will not be allowed on board the plane with their child. If a family is turned away, there will be no grounds for compensation.

Alistair Luxmoore, founder of the independent tour operator, Fleewinter, said: “It’s difficult to argue with an initiative aimed at child smuggling, but we’d rather this problem was tackled globally than by a single destination. Small companies like us are keeping clients very closely informed and we are doing everything we can to minimize the risk of issues.”

Read more at The Independent