
Thousands of Saudi-government-backed accounts suspended by Twitter for violation of the social platform’s rules were used to urge a U.S.-led regime change in Iran, deflecting responsibility for the murder of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi and whitewashing Saudi human rights abuses in Yemen.
Twitter said it had removed more than 88,000 accounts for what it called a violation of its “platform manipulation policies”.
Most of the accounts were in Arabic and aimed at “amplifying messages favorable to Saudi authorities”, but Twitter said that some English language content was aimed at “Western audiences”.
The accounts, which produced and amplified more than 29 million tweets, were operated by Smaat, a social media marketing company based in Saudi Arabia.
“Our in-house technical indicators show that Smaat appears to have created, purchased, and/or managed these accounts on behalf of — but not necessarily with the knowledge of — their clients,” Twitter said in a statement.
“We have permanently suspended Smaat’s access to our service as a result, as well as the Twitter accounts of Smaat’s senior executives.”
The review of Smaat’s English language Twitter activity suggests that urging the U.S. to engage in a regime change campaign in Iran, isolating Qatar, advancing a Saudi narrative about its Yemen intervention that overlooks Riyadh’s use of child soldiers, and deflecting accusations of the Saudi leadership’s involvement in Khashoggi’s murder were top priorities.
Listen to GHOGH with Jamarlin Martin | Episode 68: Jamarlin Martin
Jamarlin talks about the recent backlash against LeBron James for not speaking up for Joshua Wong and the violent Hong Kong protestors.
Following a trial shrowded in secrecy, five people were sentenced to death on Dec. 23 for the 2018 murder of journalist Khashoggi inside the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul, according to the Washington Post.
Controversially, the two most senior officials implicated in the case, including an adviser to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, were cleared of any wrongdoing.
The trial and its findings have been described by critics as “an abhorrent miscarriage of justice“.